Legal Opinion
Sperry Rand Corporation, in 13,678 v. Knapp-Monarch Company, in 13,679
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 8, 1962No. 13679_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from a judgment entered in an action under the patent *345laws and involve the usual issues of validity and infringement. The patent in suit, No. 2,253,037, issued in August 19, 1941, on an application filed by one Raymond Knapp in November of 1937. The court below held claims 1, 5 and 11 invalid and not infringed; it held claim 13 valid and infringed. The defendant ha3 abandoned its appeal from that portion of the judgment which relates to claim 5.
PATENT IN SUIT
The patent in suit, admittedly owned by the defendant, covers a cutter head employed in an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Aerotec Industries of Calif. v. Pacific Scientific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Allen-Bradley Company v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Chisholm-Ryder Co., Inc. v. Lewis Mfg. Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.