Legal Opinion
Urologix, Inc. v. PROSTALUND AB
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 10, 2002No. 02-C-0318PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Urologix, Inc. (“Urologix”) alleges that defendants ProstaLund AB, ProstaLund Operations AB, and Circón Corporation a/k/a ACMI Corporation (collectively, “ProstaLund”) infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,234,004 (issued Aug. 10, 1993) (the “ ’004 patent”), entitled “Method and Apparatus for the Surgical Treatment of Tissues by Thermal Effect, and in Particular the Prostate, Using a Urethral Microwave-Emitting Probe Means” and U.S. Patent No. 5,509,929 (issued Apr. 23, 1996) (the “ ’929 patent”), entitled “Urethral Probe and Apparatus for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rohm and Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arrow International v. Spire Biomedical, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Urologix, Inc. v. PROSTALUND ABDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003