Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Sukaro Kennels

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1996No. 95-1326PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a district court judgment awarding them damages for injuries their pet dog received while it was boarded at defendant kennel. They contend the district court erred in refusing to award damages based on their emotional distress or the replacement value or intrinsic value of the dog and in ordering them to pay costs. We affirm.

I. Background Facts.

John and Evelyn Nichols boarded their seven-year-old toy poodle, Yawbus, with Su-karo Kennels. During her stay at the kennel, the kennel owner’s dog tore off Yawbus’s left front leg and shoulder blade. Yawbus was taken to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnhill v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Daughen v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Campbell v. ANIMAL QUARANTINE STATION, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. La Porte v. Associated Independents, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kondaurov v. KerdashaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Fackler v. GenetzkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Webster v. BooneColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. McDougall v. LammSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API