Legal Opinion

Fackler v. Genetzky

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1999No. S-98-457PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Howard S. Fackler and Patricia A. Fackler appeal from a summary judgment entered against them by the district court in their professional negligence action against Roger M. Genetzky, a veterinarian. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Pleadings

The Facklers filed a petition in the district court on February 12, 1997, against Genetzky and the Atokad racetrack, located in South Sioux City, Nebraska. Atokad subsequently settled with the Facklers and was dismissed as a defendant. The petition generally…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Daughen v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Price v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kondaurov v. KerdashaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Ferguson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Kanne v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API