Legal Opinion

City Bond & Share, Inc. v. Klement

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1931No. 23251. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

— The respondent, a brokerage house engaged in buying and selling securities at Seattle, Washington, brought this suit to recover judgment against the appellants on a promissory note for $6,500, and for $919.67 as commissions on the purchase and sale of stocks. The complaint contained two separate causes of action, one upon the note and the other upon the commissions.

The- appellants in their answer denied liability as to each cause of action, and pleaded affirmatively seven separate defenses. The tenor of these defenses was that the note had been pledged with the respondent to secure the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beglinger v. ShieldWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Casety v. JamisonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gosslee v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Buffington v. HentonWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Of Washington v. Daren M. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Rossman v. NewbonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Marvik v. WinkelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Marvik v. WinkelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API