Rossman v. Newbon
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Htühee, J.
These actions are in tort. Respondents Carrie M. Rossman and Edna D. Boehme suffered physical injuries as a result, it is claimed, of the negligence of appellants in the operation of their respective motor vehicles. An automobile owned and operated by defendant Newbon and one operated by appellant DuBois, an agent of appellant Lauter Piano Company, collided on a public highway. They seek the recovery of the resultant damages. John A. Boehme, the husband of Edna, sues to recover the damages consequent upon the injuries to his wife. There were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Minot v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Jackson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Walter v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Darlington's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- City Bond & Share, Inc. v. KlementWashington Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lansburgh & Bro. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Juliano v. AbelesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Couch v. Southern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Bree v. JalbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Bowen v. Healy's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.