Legal Opinion
Buffington v. Henton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1912No. 10483PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Grady, J., entered June 17, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
On the 1st day of September, 1910, the plaintiffs and the defendant husband entered into the following written contract: v
“Sunnyside, Washington, 9-1, 1919.
“This contract and agreement entered into between A. S. Henton, party of the first part, and J. T. Buffington & Son, parties of the second part.
“The parties of the second part agree to drill a 5 3-8 inch well for consideration of $2.75 per ft. for the first 100 feet.; $3 per ft. from 100 to 150 ft. and $3.25 from 150 to 200 ft. The parties of the second part agree to furnish all fuel, board and move the machinery.
“The party of the first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Knight v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Phillips v. Behn & FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Jones v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- City Bond & Share, Inc. v. KlementWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Spokane v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- O'Brien v. Puget Sound Plywood, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.