Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Daren M. Morales

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 26, 2016No. 72913-6-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 The constitutional right to jury trial requires that a sentence must be authorized by a jury’s verdict. Here, the jury’s verdict stated that Daren M. Morales was guilty of the crime of “Child Molestation in the Second Degree.” The State did not charge Morales with this crime. The trial court did not instruct the jury on it. And the parties’ closing arguments did not mention this crime.

¶2 The trial court discharged the jury after polling its members on the verdict. Over a week after the court discharged the jury, Morales moved for a new trial. He based the motion on the difference between…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Geschwind v. FlanaganWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Randolph C. Clark-elCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington v. Dwayne Earl BartholomewCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. State of Washington v. Karrlee Theresa ClementsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State Of Washington v. Dwayne Earl BartholomewCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API