Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Marvik v. Winkelman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 23, 2005No. 31730-3-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Mary Winkelman, the defendant in a personal injury case, challenges the trial court’s refusal either to correct a jury verdict or to grant her motion for a new trial after jurors indicated they had incorrectly completed the jury verdict form. Holding that the error on the verdict form did not inhere in the verdict, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Hunt, J.

FACTS

¶2 Carrie Marvik was injured in an automobile accident with Mary Winkelman. Marvik sued for her injuries. Winkelman did not contest liability, and the damages issue went to a jury. After hearing testimony, the jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Robinson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State Of Washington v. Daren M. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Ramey v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Ramey v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API