Vermont Farm Machine Co. v. Marble
United States Circuit Court
In Equity,
1Opinion of the CourtWnEKiia, J.
The bill was brought for an adjudication that the orators were entitled to a patent, pursuant to section 4915, Rev. St. The defendant accepted service of the subpoena to have the same effect as if duly served on him by a proper officer, and acknowledged receipt oí a copy, but did not appear in court, nor made any objection to proceeding to decree. After hearing the orators, a decree was made and entered in their favor. 19 Fed. Rep. 307. The present commissioner now moves for a rehearing, principally upon the ground *118of alleged want of jurisdiction of this court. One mode of attempting to show…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tomlinson of High Point v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Jones v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Allured v. VollerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Ludlum Steel Co. v. TerryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1928
- Baxter Laboratories, Inc. v. Don Baxter, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.