Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Schollenberger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1878PublishedCited by 345 opinions

Petition for a .mandamus to the' judges of 'the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Schollenberger, a citizen- of- Pennsylvania, brought..sundry suits, in said Circuit. Court against certain foreign insurance 'companies, upon policies which they had severally issiied upon his property situate in that State and-within'the jurisdiction of the court.

Read the full summary

Petition for a .mandamus to the' judges of 'the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Schollenberger, a citizen- of- Pennsylvania, brought..sundry suits, in said Circuit. Court against certain foreign insurance 'companies, upon policies which they had severally issiied upon his property situate in that State and-within'the jurisdiction of the court. Each company, before the issue of its policy, had- accepted the-provisions of the statute of the State, and, in compliance, therewith', appointed its agent residing there,-on whom process of law against it…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus,' requiring the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to hear and determine certain suits brought in that court in favor of the relators against 'a number of insurance companies incorporated by the laws of other, States, but, doing business in that State under a license ' granted pursuant to a statute regulating that subject. The Circuit Court declines to entertain jurisdiction of the causes, for the reason, as is alleged, that the defendant companies were not “ at the commencement of the respective…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Railroad Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Ex Parte McNielSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Day v. Newark India-Rubber Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1850

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by345 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API