Legal Opinion

Allured v. Voller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Osceola; McMahon, J. Ejectment by Robert A. Allured against James H. Voller. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of ejectment. Plaintiff recovered a judgment, and defendant appeals. Special findings of fact were filed, from which it appears that prior to September 8, 1892, one Elbert D. Pierson was the owner of the property in question. Plaintiff on that day filed a claim of lien with the register of deeds, and the defendant at about the same date also filed a claim of lien. On the 3d of November, 1892, plaintiff and defendant both commenced suit in the Osceola circuit court against Pierson. Defendant, it would appear, failed to prosecute his suit to effect, but after the levy upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MonellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  2. Keeler v. KeelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Vermont Farm Machine Co. v. MarbleUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
  4. Koepke v. DyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cheney v. HardingNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Allured v. VollerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Herr v. Humphrey, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Jones v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In Re Marriage of MeridethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API