Legal Opinion
Ludlum Steel Co. v. Terry
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 10, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
This suit is brought by the plaintiff company for the infringement of three patents issued to Armstrong, plaintiff’s assignor. The patents are numbered 1,323,511,1,456,088, and 1,533,783, respectively, and will be referred to herein as the first, second, and third patents.
The first patent is for a stable surface alloy steel, the essential components of which are silicon, chromium, carbon, and, iron. This patent was applied for May 24, 1919, and the patent was issued November 25, 1919. The second patent, application for which was filed December 12, 1919, and the patent…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Nickel Company v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1938
- Eclipse MacH. Co. v. J. H. Specialty Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933
- Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956