Legal Opinion
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1935PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, X
Plaintiff asserts that the court erred in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint, thereby determining that the ordinance in question is valid, and that the court erred in not holding said ordinance to be void, and erred in entering a decree dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.
Plaintiff contends that ordinance No. 61451 violates section 20, Article I of the state constitution, which provides: “No law shall be passed granting to any citizen or class of citizens, privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.” Citing…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Metropolis Theater Company, Plffs. In Err. v. City of Chicago and Ernest J. MagerstadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Huckaba v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Simmons v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.