Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Umatilla County v. Hawks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus, instituted originally in this court by Umatilla County, acting by and through its County Court, to compel the assessor of that county to enter and apportion upon the assessment-rolls of Umatilla County the sum of $66,976.81 for market road purposes, in compliance with the order of the County Court levying a tax in the above-mentioned sum for the aforesaid purpose and directing the county assessor to extend the tax so levied upon the tax-rolls of Umatilla County, as by law required.

The alternative writ of mandamus, and the return thereto, discloses the facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Dorsey & Macklin, & Donnelly & Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Ex parte HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. PhenlineOregon Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Kendall v. MohlerOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. HighfieldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Pardee v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Korth v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API