Legal Opinion

Rosevear v. Rosevear

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1998No. A077145PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, J.

Carol Rosevear appeals from an order granting respondent Jack Rosevear’s motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 for entry of judgment by stipulation, and denying her motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473 and Family Code1 section 2120 to set aside the same judgment. Carol2 contends the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant her motion to set aside the stipulated judgment. We affirm the trial court’s order and entry of judgment.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

The parties separated on November 29, 1993. Jack filed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Eben-King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Brawley v. J.C. Interiors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Brewer v. FedericiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Starpoint Properties v. NamvarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Thorne v. RaccinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API