Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Raccina

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 2012No. H036177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, Acting P. J.

Steven C. Thorne and Laura L. Raccina entered into a stipulated marital dissolution judgment in 1999 under which Laura1 agreed to accept 16 percent of Steven’s military retired pay starting in 2008 based on his rank and pay level at the time of the judgment. In 2010, Laura sought to set aside the judgment because she learned that courts apply the “time rule”2 for apportioning a pension’s community and separate property interests. The trial court found that the parties’ contractual intention was to enter into an *496agreement that complied with California law and held…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Doan v. WilkersonNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  3. J. Ladley & C. Meier v. PSEACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Kurz v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Marriage of Bogan and Lewis CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API