Legal Opinion

People v. Giminez

California Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1975No. Crim. 17899PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.*

Defendant was convicted of narcotics possession (former Health & Saf. Code, § 11500). After defendant refused to accept the conditions of a five-year period of probation, the trial court imposed a prison sentence and directed that it commence upon completion of the term defendant was currently serving for another drug conviction.1 On appeal, defendant now contends that to so impose a consecutive sentence, after having offered him probation, constituted an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. In light of the defendant’s lengthy history of narcotics abuse and anti-social…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re SandelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API