People v. Giminez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.*
Defendant was convicted of narcotics possession (former Health & Saf. Code, § 11500). After defendant refused to accept the conditions of a five-year period of probation, the trial court imposed a prison sentence and directed that it commence upon completion of the term defendant was currently serving for another drug conviction.1 On appeal, defendant now contends that to so impose a consecutive sentence, after having offered him probation, constituted an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. In light of the defendant’s lengthy history of narcotics abuse and anti-social…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re SandelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.