Legal Opinion
Cooper v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1975No. Civ. 44153PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for declaratoiy relief decreeing that a certain Los Angeles County zoning ordinance is void and of no legal effect.
Pierce Sherman who is the real party in interest owns 11.32 acres of land on the north side of the Pacific Coast Highway within the community of Malibu which property was previously zoned for residential use. On January 5, 1971, he applied for, and effective July 15, 1971, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles, by ordinance, approved the change in the zoning of the property to recreational and resort use.
On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Patterson v. Central Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hills for Everyone v. Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Miller v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.