Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Miller v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1983No. Civ. 54345PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

The basic issue presented by this appeal involves the constitutionality of pawnbroker regulations adopted by the City and County of San Francisco.

Appellants are several licensed pawnbrokers operating pawnshops in San Francisco. Respondents are the San Francisco Chief of Police and the San Francisco Police Commission. Appellants filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against respondents challenging the constitutionality of pawnbroker regulations established by respondents under authority of section 2815 of article 28…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wilkinson v. Times Mirror Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Perkey v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Malish v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. JEHACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API