Legal Opinion
Hills for Everyone v. Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1980No. Civ. 21227PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
This appeal concerns the proper method of testing the validity of a completed city annexation where the challenge is grounded on an alleged failure of the Local Agency Formation Commission to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) and the Knox-Nisbet Act (Gov. Code, § 54773 et seq.).
Petitioner, an unincorporated association, filed a petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Orange County to set aside its approval of a proposal to annex 3,979…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Planning and Conservation League v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- McLeod v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.