Legal Opinion · Dissent

S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 30, 2001No. 1 CA-CV-00-0347Published

1DissentEhrlich, Judge

¶ 46 I dissent from the analysis employed by the majority. This case presents a paradigm for the application of contract principles to a straightforward commercial real-estate contract between equally informed and sophisticated parties represented by legal counsel.

¶47 When the appellees bought the two apartment complexes from the appellants, both purchase contracts contained a substantially similar provision, which stated:

Disclaimer of Warranties. Buyer acknowledges that except as expressly set forth in the Agreement, Seller makes and has made no representations or warranties of any kind…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Kaye v. BuehrleOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Richey v. PatrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API