S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentEhrlich, Judge
¶ 46 I dissent from the analysis employed by the majority. This case presents a paradigm for the application of contract principles to a straightforward commercial real-estate contract between equally informed and sophisticated parties represented by legal counsel.
¶47 When the appellees bought the two apartment complexes from the appellants, both purchase contracts contained a substantially similar provision, which stated:
Disclaimer of Warranties. Buyer acknowledges that except as expressly set forth in the Agreement, Seller makes and has made no representations or warranties of any kind…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Kaye v. BuehrleOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Richey v. PatrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.