Legal Opinion

Richey v. Patrick

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1995No. 94-50PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

This case concerns the effect of a nondisclosure of sediment in a well system by the seller of realty under an “as is” contract. The district court concluded that the sellers’ failure to disclose was negligent and amounted to a misrepresentation.

We reverse.

The sellers raise eight issues:

1. Did the Trial Court err in finding the contract void ab initio?

2. Did the Trial Court err in finding a fraudulent inducement?

3. Did the Trial Court err in failing to find that the purchasers had waived their right to claim there were misrepresentations which induced them to purchase the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Claman v. PoppWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bauer v. GiannisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API