Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 2005No. A03-1893PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H„ Justice.

Appellants, the Minneapolis law firm of Best & Flanagan and two of its attorneys (Best & Flanagan), appeal from a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision that a district court order denying their motion to dismiss on remand was not based on jurisdictional grounds and therefore was not immediately appealable. Best & Flanagan claims that the district court lost jurisdiction over it when the court entered judgment dismissing the claims of respondents, George Janssen, et al. (Janssen), against all defendants, and Janssen failed to include Best & Flanagan as a party to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Janssen v. Best & FlanaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Halverson v. Village of DeerwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Engvall v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. MonterminiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API