Bralley v. Daugherty
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
An injury sustained by an employee is compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act only if it was “received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment.” R. C. 4123.01(C); R. C. 4123.54; Fassig v. State, ex rel. Turner (1917), 95 Ohio St. 232.
The test of the right to participate in the Workers’ Compensation Fund is not whether there was any fault or neglect on the part of the employer or his employees, but whether a “causal connection” existed between an employee’s injury and his employment either through the activities, the conditions or the environment of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Industrial Commission v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Kasari v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- MTD Products, Inc. v. RobatinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.