Industrial Commission v. Henry
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlubn, J.
Tbe sole legal question presented by this record is whether under tbe facts conceded in tbe agreed statement and disclosed in tbe evidence tbe husband of the plaintiff below was injured in tbe course of bis employment. Tbe record discloses and tbe commission concedes that upon tbe morning in question, in tbe neighborhood of 2 o’clock, after Henry bad started bis work for tbe day by giving his order for tbe amount of milk required for bis delivery route, be went for bis breakfast to tbe north across tbe tracks of tbe Big Four Railroad, and to come back to tbe dairy was compelled to return…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Wabash Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Industrial Commission v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.