Lord v. Daugherty
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Appellant asserts three propositions of law:
1. “Where an employee suffers an accidental death as a direct result of operating a piece of equipment owned by his employer, which he was hired to operate, whether he is within the scope of his employment is a question of fact and it is error *443for the trial court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendants as a matter of law.”
2. "It will be presumed that an employee who is shown to have been engaged in his employment a short time before his death continued in such employment up to the time of his death in the absence of evidence to the contrary.”
3…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevens v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by113 opinions
- Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- MTD Products, Inc. v. RobatinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Friebel v. Visiting Nurse Assn. of Mid-Ohio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Fletcher v. Northwest Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.