Legal Opinion

Kasari v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. 23443PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMabshall, C. J.

The question to be determined in this case is whether Kasari was, at the time of his injury, in the course of his employment, and in its ]ast analysis it must be ascertained whether his approach to the plant of the employer, after reaching the premises of the employer, but before reaching the plant, brings him within the hazards of the employment. In deciding the instant case, it is not necessary to declare a universal rule that the hazards begin in all instances at the point where the employe crosses the line of the employer’s premises. The extent of the grounds of the employer and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Texas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Industrial Commission v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bridgeport Bank Co. v. Shadyside Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bass v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API