Legal Opinion
Kirkpatrick v. City of Oceanside
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1991No. D011075PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
—Merrill L. Kirkpatrick and Rosanna F. Kirkpatrick (Kirkpatricks), husband and wife owners of an Oceanside mobilehome park named Laguna Vista Mobile Estates, appeal from an order dismissing this action after the trial court sustained without leave to amend general demurrers brought by the State of California (State) and the City of Oceanside (City) to Kirkpatricks’ complaint for inverse condemnation and declaratory relief. 1 Kirkpatricks sought to have the City’s mobilehome rent control ordinance, Ordinance No. 82-27 (Ordinance), declared unconstitutional as applied to their…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rodgers v. Sargent Controls & AerospaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- YKA Industries, Inc. v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bame v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Economic Empowerment Foundation v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.