Legal Opinion
Bame v. City of Del Mar
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 2001No. D034206, D034354PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
The 22nd District Agricultural Association (the District) appeals a judgment in favor of the City of Del Mar (the City) declaring Del Mar Municipal Code section 3.08 et seq. (the ordinance) facially valid and the City entitled under Business and Professions Code section 19610.6 1 to assess and collect license fees and admissions taxes on certain events conducted under contract with the District. The District asks us to declare the ordinance unconstitutional as ultra vires, or alternatively as applied on the grounds it (1) infringes on the District’s sovereign immunity; (2)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Hodge v. KIRKPATRICK DEVELOPMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Groves v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Maxwell v. DolezalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.