Legal Opinion
Conrac Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 8, 1977No. 368-74PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
This appeal under the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321, 322 (1970), before the court on defendant’s request for review of Trial Judge Francis C. Browne’s opinion filed June 28, 1976, raises two questions of interpretation of the so-called Truth in Negotiations Act, 10 U.S.C. § 2306(f) (1970) (hereinafter the Act). The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the board) agreed with the contracting officer that the contract in issue was "overpriced,” due to insufficient cost information disclosure to the Government by the contractor, though it lowered the amount of the refund to the Government…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sperry Flight Systems Division of Sperry Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Jefferson Construction Co. Of Florida, a Florida Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- H. R. Henderson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Fruin-Colnon Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- American Electric Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Precision Piping, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Singer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.