Legal Opinion
Beekwilder v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 26, 2002No. 96-183LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Senior Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs claim for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the regulatory taking of real property. Defendant contends that plaintiffs claims should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, summary judgment should be granted for the defendant pursuant to RCFC 56(c). After reviewing the briefs and hearing oral argument, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Henricus P. Beekwilder,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- CNA Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Duszak v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Morris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Vanderpool v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008