Morris v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs allege that they are restricted by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), acting pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544 (1988), from cutting down a small number of trees for personal use, which are located on their half-acre property. This restriction, argue plaintiffs, is a taking of private property for public use without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Defendant counters that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert E. Morris and Carol L. Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Harris Patriot Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Abacus Technology Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004