Legal Opinion

Morris v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 26, 2003No. 02-1406LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs allege that they are restricted by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), acting pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544 (1988), from cutting down a small number of trees for personal use, which are located on their half-acre property. This restriction, argue plaintiffs, is a taking of private property for public use without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Defendant counters that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robert E. Morris and Carol L. Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Harris Patriot Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Abacus Technology Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  4. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  5. Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API