Vanderpool v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed claims in this court for availability pay, which is “a form of premium pay for law enforcement officers designed to provide compensation for unscheduled overtime work that the employee performs or is available to perform.” Caven v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 392 F.3d 1378, 1379 (Fed.Cir. 2004).1 Plaintiffs rely on the Law Enforcement Availability Pay Act of 1994 (LEAPA), Pub.L. No. 103-329, § 633, 108 Stat. 2425 (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 5545a (2000)) for jurisdiction in this court.
In response to the plaintiffs’ complaint, the government filed a…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Horvath v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017