Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Duszak v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 18, 2003No. 03-1424 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This is a takings action. Before the court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

On June 10, 2003, plaintiff Malgorzata Duszak filed a takings claim in this court against the United States of America. Complaint (Compl.) at 1. Plaintiffs claim arises out of the removal by the United States Marshals Service (USMS) of plaintiffs personal property from her sublet apartment. Compl. ¶¶ 5, 12, 13. Plaintiff sublet the apartment, located at 370 Negley Avenue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from Mutual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AmeriSource Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Steward v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Garcia Carranza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Duszak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API