Legal Opinion
In Re Fischer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 4, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2951PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
Claims 1 to 5, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent relating to construction material were rejected by the Examiner, which rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office. Claims 2 and 5 are regarded as illustrative, and follow:
“2. Construction material comprising a preformed sheet of bituminous material having weblike strengthening pieces incorporated therein and separated one from another by a substantial thickness of said bituminous material.” _
“5. Construction material comprising a plurality of water proofing sheets of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- In Re ByckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Forsyth v. GarlockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- Schram Glass Mfg. Co. v. Homer Brooke Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In Re CadyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of HornemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of WarrenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952