Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 27, 1983No. Nos. 23 and 24 E.D. Appeal Docket 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Commonwealth Court1 which reversed an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) which declared that it would refuse to approve additional securities proposed to be issued by the Philadelphia Electric Company (“PECO”) in conjunction with construction of the Limerick 2 nuclear power plant.
In August, 1980, the Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate, as representative of consumer interests before the PUC,2 petitioned the PUC for an investigation of the need for and fiscal wisdom of constructing the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Swarthmore Borough v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Park Towne & Madway Engineers & Constructors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Attorney General v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Maine Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.