Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1987No. 22 C.D. 1986 and 58 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

This appeal results from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC or Commission) which granted certain exceptions of Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) filed with respect to the recommended opinion of Administrative Law Judge Allison Turner (the ALJ). The granting of the exceptions had the practical effect of permitting PECO to complete construction of Limerick Unit No. 2, a nuclear-powered electric generating station.

The PUC order involved declared specifically that “unconditioned completion of construction of Limerick Unit No. 2 is not in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Chappell v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Keystone Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beers v. UN. COMP. BD. of REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. East Rockhill Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Cresco, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. SME Bessemer Cement, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. E. Rockhill T. v. Pa. PucCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API