Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1988No. Appeals, 2248 C.D. 1986, 2269 C.D. 1986 and 2279 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) entered on June 27, 1986 have been consolidated and are presently before us for disposition. In 2248 C.D. 1986 and 2269 C.D. 1986, David M. Barasch, Consumer Advocate, hereinafter the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA), and University of Pennsylvania, Utility Users Committee (UUC/UP) have petitioned for review of the PUCs June 27, 1986 order. Also, Philadelphia Area Industrial Energy Users Group (PAIEUG) and Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) have filed briefs as intervenors. In 2279 C.D.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Robinson Township School District v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Albert Einstein Healthcare Foundation/University v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. G. Hudock & G. Hudock, h/w v. Saltlick Twp., PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API