Legal Opinion

Bullion v. Gahm

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2005No. 05CA2995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} The Bullions and Gahms, who are owners of adjacent property in rural Scioto County, became involved in a legal dispute over the ownership of a small tract of land that adjoins their parcels. The Bullions claimed the property by adverse possession, while the Gahms claimed that the tract lay within their deed’s description. The trial court decided that the Bullions had established adverse possession, but only to a part of the tract. The Bullions appealed, arguing that the evidence established their right to the entire 3.248 acre tract. The Gahms cross-appealed and argue that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Pizza v. StropeOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Vanasdal v. BrinkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Allstate Financial Corp. v. Westfield Service Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Pettet v. PettetOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKenna v. BoyceOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Rodgers v. PahoundisOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Marcum v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Smith v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (6-20-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Wilson v. BrittonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API