Legal Opinion

Vanasdal v. Brinker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1985No. 1377PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, P.J.

Plaintiff-appellee Paul Vanasdal and defendant-appellant, Ruth Brinker, own adjoining lots on North Market Street in Lodi. Ever since he bought the property in 1940, Vanas-dal has maintained a twenty-five-foot wide strip of land between the two lots in the mistaken belief that the property was his. The strip of land contains the driveway and sole access to his garage, as well as a flower garden, trees and bushes, which he has cared for. In 1982, Brinker had a survey done which purported to show that the strip of land actually was part of her property. In August 1983, Vanasdal filed suit to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kimball v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Montieth v. Twin Falls United Methodist Church, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Fulton v. RappOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Smith v. KritesOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HayslipOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Miller v. MellottOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Serv. v. MorrowOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Evanich v. BridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API