Legal Opinion

Grace v. Koch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1998No. 96-2620PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

In this case, we examine the common-law doctrine of adverse possession. For the reasons that follow, we hold that adverse possession must be proven by clear and convincing evidence and affirm the court of appeals’ determination that the Kochs had not established title by adverse possession.

To acquire title by adverse possession, the party claiming title must show exclusive possession and open, notorious, continuous, and adverse use for a period of twenty-one years. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. Donovan (1924), 111 Ohio St. 341, 349-350, 145 N.E. 479, 482. See, also, State ex rel. A.A.A. Invest. v.…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lane v. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1861

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Bravard v. CurranOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. Houck v. Board of Park CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API