Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Pizza v. Strope
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1990No. Nos. 89-763 and 89-765PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The present action was instituted by appellee pursuant to R.C. 3767.02. This section provides:
“Any person, who uses, occupies, establishes, or conducts a nuisance, or aids or abets therein, and the owner, agent, or lessee of any interest in any such nuisance together with the persons employed in or in control of any such nuisance by any such owner, agent, or lessee is guilty of maintaining a nuisance and shall be enjoined as provided in sections 3767.03 to 3767.06, inclusive, of the Revised Code.”
“Nuisance” is defined in R.C. 3767.01(C) as follows:
“(C) ‘Nuisance’ means that which is defined…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rogers v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dale v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Howell v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Huffer v. CiceroOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thompson v. HayslipOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.