Eysenbach v. Naharkey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was filed in the district court of Tulsa county, by defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, and the parties will be referred to in this opinion as they appeared in -the trial court.
Plaintiff alleges he is the legal and equitable owner of an undivided fchree^fourths interest in the following described lands in Tulsa county. Okla., to wit: “East 14 of the northeast 14 of the southwest 14 and the c-ast % of the southeast 14 of the south-west % of section 26, twp. 19 north, range 12 east I. M. in Tulsa county,’’ and seeks to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fielder v. ChildsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- F. B. Collins Inv. Co. of Clinton v. BeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Israel v. IsraelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Robinson v. FairSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Everts v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bilby v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Naharkey v. Sand Springs HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Lasswell v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sartin v. HughenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Neal v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.