Legal Opinion
Naharkey v. Sand Springs Home
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 1936No. 22179PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUSBY. J.
In this action the plaintiff, •Millie Naharkey (referred to herein as “Little” Millie Naharkey for tlie purpose of distinction), an incompetent, who is a three-quarters blood citizen of the Creek Nation, seeks through her guardian, the First National Bank & Trust Company, to recover from the Sand Springs Home, a corporation, a one-sixth interest in 80 acres of land described as the north one-half (N. %) of the southwest quarter (S. W. %) of section two (2), township eighteen (18) north, range twelve (12) east, in Tulsa county.
It is admitted that the plaintiff was at one time the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Skelton v. DillSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Associated Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Neal v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Neal v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.