Legal Opinion

State v. Van Beek

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1999No. Criminal 980159PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Paul Van Beek appeals from an order deferring imposition of sentence for the crimes of possessing marijuana and a controlled substance. Van Beek argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On March 7, 1997, Officer Roger Becker, a veteran narcotics investigator of the Bismarck Police Department, applied for a no-knock search warrant to search the premises at 729 North 21 st Street in Bismarck. Two hearings were held on the matter, one in the morning and one in the afternoon.

[¶ 3] During the morning hearing, Officer Becker testified…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. RydbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HerrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. UtvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. DodsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API