Legal Opinion

State v. Rydberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1994No. Cr. 930281PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Teresa Ranae Rydberg appeals her criminal conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Rydberg claims the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence seized from her home under a search warrant. Rydberg challenges the validity of the warrant claiming: (1) the investigating officer, in the affidavit in support of the warrant, withheld vital information from the magistrate; and (2) the warrant was based on evidence gathered illegally during a warrantless search of her garbage.

We affirm. The “vital” information allegedly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HempeleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. People v. KrivdaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. DamronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HerrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. ThielingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API