Legal Opinion
Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 11, 1997No. 96 Civ. 5304(SWK)PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this case asserting employment discrimination on the basis of gender and race, defendant Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (“Klynveld”) moves, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), 12(b)(6) and 9(b) to dismiss the complaint of Nellie Howard (“Howard”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and failure to plead fraud with particularity. In addition, defendants Jon Madonna…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Eastern Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- George v. Professional Disposables International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Darden v. Daimlerchrysler North America Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Mende v. Milestone Technology, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.