Legal Opinion
Darden v. Daimlerchrysler North America Holding Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 14, 2002No. 01 Civ. 5056(VM)PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Darden (“Darden”) brought this action against defendants Da-imlerChrysler North America Holding Corporation (“NAH”), DaimlerChrysler Corporate Services Inc. (“CSI”), Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (“MBUSA”), Daimler Chrysler A.G. (“DCAG”) and Christl R. Gaiser (“Stoekl”) (collectively “Defendants”). Darden’s claims include: (1) racial discrimination, harassment and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“ § 1981”) and New York State and City human rights laws (“HRL”), (2) age discrimination in violation…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Harrison v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- George v. Professional Disposables International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Mende v. Milestone Technology, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Corley v. VanceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.