Legal Opinion

Toomes v. Nunes

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1938No. Civ. 5834PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit for damages for personal injuries received in an automobile casualty as the alleged result of negligence on the part of the defendants. The defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and filed a cross-complaint, charging plaintiffs with damages for injuries which they also sustained in the same accident. The jury returned a verdict against the plaintiffs upon their complaint, and awarded damages to defendants on their cross-complaint in the sum $2,500 and costs of suit. Judgment was rendered accordingly. From that judgment plaintiffs have appealed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fleming v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Dermer v. PistoresiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Maffeo v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API